Re: The March 2014 Magazine Thread

[Gary]

big Cover

http://www.vanityfair.com/dam/2014/01/march-2014-hollywood-cover-vf.jpg

This has to be the most disappointing Hollywood issue to date. I love getting this issue every year but the articles were useless (haven't read Gwyneth's yet but I bet it is watered down) and the Hollywood feature was pointless - half of it was old pictures and the "new" part was pictures of actor and actresses "without makeup" although you can see Kate Winslet is caked in it. Utterly pointless. At least the W Hollywood cover was a new decent photo shoot. Just a warning for anyone thinking of getting it.

[Vanessa12]

[Gary]

OK Mically and Vanessa I know you guys were interested in the Gwyneth article. About it - there is no article!!!! It is a mention of their "argument" in the letter from the editor. He basically sucks up to Paltrow and Paltrow asks him what she can do to become more liked. He defends the GOOP website saying that fashion magazines push a similar message and keeps mentioning she is a talented award winning actresses who is beautiful and was named most beautiful by People magazine.

So there you have it. I had to flip through the magazine 3 times to find this "article". What a load of rubbish!

[Vanessa12]

US Weekly better than Vanity Fair.   

[mically]

Unbelievable....so he let it die than try to make something interesting out of it.  I agree, the cover was a big let down as well.

[Vanessa12]

[Gary]

PLEASE MAKE THIS HAPPEN.

[Gary]

Vogue Australia

[mically]

SI Swimsuit

[Gary]

Just in case y'all were worried Allison or Jillian Michaels wouldn't be on the cover of a health magazine

Health March:

[Sponsored content]